futex: Fix additional regressions
authorArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fri, 3 Dec 2021 08:07:56 +0000 (09:07 +0100)
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Sat, 11 Dec 2021 22:31:51 +0000 (23:31 +0100)
commit0f09c274698590d508c43f924d9dffc7130b782d
tree38b9923a8f6f488b2826cd45c3e80f61eaa2e271
parent77993b595ada5731e513eb06a0f4bf4b9f1e9532
futex: Fix additional regressions

Naresh reported another architecture that was broken by the same typo that
was already fixed for three architectures: mips also refers to the
futex_atomic_op_inuser_local() function by the wrong name and runs into a
missing closing '}' as well.

Going through the source tree the same typo was found in the documentation
as well as in the xtensa code, both of which ended up escaping the
regression testing so far. In the case of xtensa, it appears that the
broken code path is only used when building for platforms that are not
supported by the default gcc configuration, so they are impossible to test
for with default setups.

After going through these more carefully and fixing up the typos, all
architectures have been build-tested again to ensure that this is now
complete.

Fixes: 4e0d84634445 ("futex: Fix sparc32/m68k/nds32 build regression")
Fixes: 3f2bedabb62c ("futex: Ensure futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() is present")
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211203080823.2938839-1-arnd@kernel.org
arch/mips/include/asm/futex.h
arch/xtensa/include/asm/futex.h
include/asm-generic/futex.h