ovl: initialize ovl_copy_up_ctx.destname inside ovl_do_copy_up()

ovl: initialize ovl_copy_up_ctx.destname inside ovl_do_copy_up()

The ->destname member of struct ovl_copy_up_ctx is initialized inside
ovl_copy_up_one() to ->d_name of the overlayfs dentry being copied up
and then it may be overridden by index name inside ovl_do_copy_up().

ovl_inode_lock() in ovl_copy_up_start() and ovl_copy_up() in ovl_rename()
effectively stabilze ->d_name of the overlayfs dentry being copied up,
but ovl_inode_lock() is not held when ->d_name is being read.

It is not a correctness bug, because if ovl_do_copy_up() races with
ovl_rename() and ctx.destname is freed, we will not end up calling
ovl_do_copy_up() with the dead name reference.

The code becomes much easier to understand and to document if the
initialization of c->destname is always done inside ovl_do_copy_up(),
either to the index entry name, or to the overlay dentry ->d_name.

Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>