tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef

tick/nohz: Move tick_nohz_full_mask declaration outside the #ifdef

tick_nohz_full_mask lists the CPUs that are nohz_full. This is only needed when
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined. tick_nohz_full_cpu() allows a specific CPU to be
tested against the mask, and evaluates to false when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is not
defined.

The resctrl code needs to pick a CPU to run some work on, a new helper prefers
housekeeping CPUs by examining the tick_nohz_full_mask. Hiding the declaration
behind #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL forces all the users to be behind an #ifdef
too.

Move the tick_nohz_full_mask declaration, this lets callers drop the #ifdef,
and guard access to tick_nohz_full_mask with IS_ENABLED() or something like
tick_nohz_full_cpu().

The definition does not need to be moved as any callers should be removed at
compile time unless CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL is defined.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> # for resctrl dependency
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> # arm64
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213184438.16675-2-james.morse@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>