x86/extable: Fix ex_handler_msr() print condition
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:52:06 +0000 (16:52 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:23:14 +0000 (14:23 +0200)
commit7bc43ab2b90ae2d321948db1d0141efe45f3bdb1
treefa684780968158ce16117fda5c73f8794486432a
parentb3d3069a6fc838e25d49e7705a1dc5c24e260baf
x86/extable: Fix ex_handler_msr() print condition

[ Upstream commit a1a5482a2c6e38a3ebed32e571625c56a8cc41a6 ]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:08:52PM +0300, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Some changes to the way invalid MSR accesses are reported by the
> kernel is causing some problems with messages printed on the
> console.
>
> We have seen several cases of ex_handler_msr() printing invalid MSR
> accesses once but the callstack multiple times causing confusion on
> the console.

> The problem here is that another earlier commit (5.13):
>
a358f40600b3 ("once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality")
>
> Modifies all the pr_*_once() calls to always return true claiming
> that no caller is ever checking the return value of the functions.
>
> This is why we are seeing the callstack printed without the
> associated printk() msg.

Extract the ONCE_IF(cond) part into __ONCE_LTE_IF() and use that to
implement DO_ONCE_LITE_IF() and fix the extable code.

Fixes: a358f40600b3 ("once: implement DO_ONCE_LITE for non-fast-path "do once" functionality")
Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YqyVFsbviKjVGGZ9@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
arch/x86/mm/extable.c
include/linux/once_lite.h