RISC-V: resort all extensions in consistent orders
Ordering between each and every list of extensions is wildly
inconsistent. Per discussion on the lists pick the following policy:
- The array defining order in /proc/cpuinfo follows a narrow
interpretation of the ISA specifications, described in a comment
immediately presiding it.
- All other lists of extensions are sorted alphabetically.
This will hopefully allow for easier review & future additions, and
reduce conflicts between patchsets as the number of extensions grows.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221129144742.2935581-2-conor.dooley@microchip.com/
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221205144525.2148448-3-conor.dooley@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>