virtiofsd: prevent fv_queue_thread() vs virtio_loop() races
We call into libvhost-user from the virtqueue handler thread and the
vhost-user message processing thread without a lock. There is nothing
protecting the virtqueue handler thread if the vhost-user message
processing thread changes the virtqueue or memory table while it is
running.
This patch introduces a read-write lock. Virtqueue handler threads are
readers. The vhost-user message processing thread is a writer. This
will allow concurrency for multiqueue in the future while protecting
against fv_queue_thread() vs virtio_loop() races.
Note that the critical sections could be made smaller but it would be
more invasive and require libvhost-user changes. Let's start simple and
improve performance later, if necessary. Another option would be an
RCU-style approach with lighter-weight primitives.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>