Merge branch 'minor-cleanups-to-skb-frag-ref-unref'

Merge branch 'minor-cleanups-to-skb-frag-ref-unref'

Mina Almasry says:

====================
Minor cleanups to skb frag ref/unref

This series is largely motivated by a recent discussion where there was
some confusion on how to properly ref/unref pp pages vs non pp pages:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHS8izOoO-EovwMwAm9tLYetwikNPxC0FKyVGu1TPJWSz4bGoA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t

There is some subtely there because pp uses page->pp_ref_count for
refcounting, while non-pp uses get_page()/put_page() for ref counting.
Getting the refcounting pairs wrong can lead to kernel crash.

Additionally currently it may not be obvious to skb users unaware of
page pool internals how to properly acquire a ref on a pp frag. It
requires checking of skb->pp_recycle & is_pp_page() to make the correct
calls and may require some handling at the call site aware of arguable pp
internals.

This series is a minor refactor with a couple of goals:

1. skb users should be able to ref/unref a frag using
   [__]skb_frag_[un]ref() functions without needing to understand pp
   concepts and pp_ref_count vs get/put_page() differences.

2. reference counting functions should have a mirror opposite. I.e. there
   should be a foo_unref() to every foo_ref() with a mirror opposite
   implementation (as much as possible).

This is RFC to collect feedback if this change is desirable, but also so
that I don't race with the fix for the issue Dragos is seeing for his
crash.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHS8izN436pn3SndrzsCyhmqvJHLyxgCeDpWXA4r1ANt3RCDLQ@mail.gmail.com/T/
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410190505.1225848-1-almasrymina@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>