The current code expects the type of the value to be an integer type,
instead the value passed to the macro is a pointer.
Ensure the size comparison uses the correct pointer type to choose the
max value, instead of using the integer type.
Fixes: 923044133367 ("ACPI: property: Unify integer value reading functions")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Binding <sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
break; \
} \
if (__items[i].integer.value > _Generic(__val, \
- u8: U8_MAX, \
- u16: U16_MAX, \
- u32: U32_MAX, \
- u64: U64_MAX, \
+ u8 *: U8_MAX, \
+ u16 *: U16_MAX, \
+ u32 *: U32_MAX, \
+ u64 *: U64_MAX, \
default: 0U)) { \
ret = -EOVERFLOW; \
break; \