drm/i915: Treat SAGV block time 0 as SAGV disabled
authorVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 9 Mar 2022 16:49:41 +0000 (18:49 +0200)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 12:24:04 +0000 (14:24 +0200)
commit 1937f3feb0e84089ae4065e09c871b8ab4676f01 upstream.

For modern platforms the spec explicitly states that a
SAGV block time of zero means that SAGV is not supported.
Let's extend that to all platforms. Supposedly there should
be no systems where this isn't true, and it'll allow us to:
- use the same code regardless of older vs. newer platform
- wm latencies already treat 0 as disabled, so this fits well
  with other related code
- make it a bit more clear when SAGV is used vs. not
- avoid overflows from adding U32_MAX with a u16 wm0 latency value
  which could cause us to miscalculate the SAGV watermarks on tgl+

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220309164948.10671-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit d8f5855b31c0523ea3b171db8dfb998830e8735d)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c

index c7c8a556e401a175dd292563761e8be78d09a9c1..57c1dda76b94aa9be4bfc0c16c57f96607a7a819 100644 (file)
@@ -3713,8 +3713,7 @@ skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                MISSING_CASE(DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv));
        }
 
-       /* Default to an unusable block time */
-       dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = -1;
+       dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -5635,7 +5634,7 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
        result->min_ddb_alloc = max(min_ddb_alloc, blocks) + 1;
        result->enable = true;
 
-       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12)
+       if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) < 12 && dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
                result->can_sagv = latency >= dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
 }
 
@@ -5666,7 +5665,10 @@ static void tgl_compute_sagv_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);
        struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = &plane_wm->sagv.wm0;
        struct skl_wm_level *levels = plane_wm->wm;
-       unsigned int latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0] + dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;
+       unsigned int latency = 0;
+
+       if (dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)
+               latency = dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us + dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];
 
        skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, 0, latency,
                             wm_params, &levels[0],