The section index is always positive, so the argument, secindex, should
be unsigned.
Also, inserted the array range check.
If sym->st_shndx is a special section index (between SHN_LORESERVE and
SHN_HIRESERVE), there is no corresponding section header.
For example, if a symbol specifies an absolute value, sym->st_shndx is
SHN_ABS (=0xfff1).
The current users do not cause the out-of-range access of
info->sechddrs[], but it is better to avoid such a pitfall.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
sechdr->sh_name);
}
-static const char *sec_name(const struct elf_info *info, int secindex)
+static const char *sec_name(const struct elf_info *info, unsigned int secindex)
{
+ /*
+ * If sym->st_shndx is a special section index, there is no
+ * corresponding section header.
+ * Return "" if the index is out of range of info->sechdrs[] array.
+ */
+ if (secindex >= info->num_sections)
+ return "";
+
return sech_name(info, &info->sechdrs[secindex]);
}