Not all uses of __diag_ignore_all(...) in BPF-related code in order to
suppress warnings are wrapping kfunc definitions. Some "hook point"
definitions - small functions meant to be used as attach points for
fentry and similar BPF progs - need to suppress -Wmissing-declarations.
We could use __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs added in the previous patch in
such cases, but this might be confusing to someone unfamiliar with BPF
internals. Instead, this patch adds __bpf_hook_{start,end} macros,
currently having the same effect as __bpf_kfunc_{start,end}_defs, then
uses them to suppress warnings for two hook points in the kernel itself
and some bpf_testmod hook points as well.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231031215625.2343848-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
"Global kfuncs as their definitions will be in BTF")
#define __bpf_kfunc_end_defs() __diag_pop()
+#define __bpf_hook_start() __bpf_kfunc_start_defs()
+#define __bpf_hook_end() __bpf_kfunc_end_defs()
/*
* Return the name of the passed struct, if exists, or halt the build if for
* optimize away the callsite. Therefore, __weak is needed to ensure that the
* call is still emitted, by telling the compiler that we don't know what the
* function might eventually be.
- *
- * __diag_* below are needed to dismiss the missing prototype warning.
*/
-__diag_push();
-__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
- "kfuncs which will be used in BPF programs");
+
+__bpf_hook_start();
__weak noinline void bpf_rstat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp,
struct cgroup *parent, int cpu)
{
}
-__diag_pop();
+__bpf_hook_end();
/* see cgroup_rstat_flush() */
static void cgroup_rstat_flush_locked(struct cgroup *cgrp)
* Therefore, __weak is needed to ensure that the call is still
* emitted, by telling the compiler that we don't know what the
* function might eventually be.
- *
- * __diag_* below are needed to dismiss the missing prototype warning.
*/
-__diag_push();
-__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
- "A fmod_ret entry point for BPF programs");
+__bpf_hook_start();
__weak noinline int update_socket_protocol(int family, int type, int protocol)
{
return protocol;
}
-__diag_pop();
+__bpf_hook_end();
int __sys_socket(int family, int type, int protocol)
{
int b;
};
-__diag_push();
-__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
- "Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF");
+__bpf_hook_start();
noinline int
bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 a, int b, int c) {
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_fentry_shadow_test);
-__diag_pop();
+__bpf_hook_end();
static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = {
.attr = { .name = "bpf_testmod", .mode = 0666, },