stackleak: clarify variable names
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:31:20 +0000 (18:31 +0100)
committerKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Sun, 8 May 2022 08:33:08 +0000 (01:33 -0700)
The logic within __stackleak_erase() can be a little hard to follow, as
`boundary` switches from being the low bound to the high bound mid way
through the function, and `kstack_ptr` is used to represent the start of
the region to erase while `boundary` represents the end of the region to
erase.

Make this a little clearer by consistently using clearer variable names.
The `boundary` variable is removed, the bounds of the region to erase
are described by `erase_low` and `erase_high`, and bounds of the task
stack are described by `task_stack_low` and `task_stack_high`.

As the same time, remove the comment above the variables, since it is
unclear whether it's intended as rationale, a complaint, or a TODO, and
is more confusing than helpful.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220427173128.2603085-6-mark.rutland@arm.com
kernel/stackleak.c

index 24b7cf01b2972a5f4cfc8862fb1e0763b91ac081..d5f684dc0a2d929e8c54406cb370b7012cc4e289 100644 (file)
@@ -73,40 +73,38 @@ late_initcall(stackleak_sysctls_init);
 static __always_inline void __stackleak_erase(void)
 {
        const unsigned long task_stack_low = stackleak_task_low_bound(current);
-
-       /* It would be nice not to have 'kstack_ptr' and 'boundary' on stack */
-       unsigned long kstack_ptr = current->lowest_stack;
-       unsigned long boundary = task_stack_low;
+       unsigned long erase_low = current->lowest_stack;
+       unsigned long erase_high;
        unsigned int poison_count = 0;
        const unsigned int depth = STACKLEAK_SEARCH_DEPTH / sizeof(unsigned long);
 
        /* Search for the poison value in the kernel stack */
-       while (kstack_ptr > boundary && poison_count <= depth) {
-               if (*(unsigned long *)kstack_ptr == STACKLEAK_POISON)
+       while (erase_low > task_stack_low && poison_count <= depth) {
+               if (*(unsigned long *)erase_low == STACKLEAK_POISON)
                        poison_count++;
                else
                        poison_count = 0;
 
-               kstack_ptr -= sizeof(unsigned long);
+               erase_low -= sizeof(unsigned long);
        }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_METRICS
-       current->prev_lowest_stack = kstack_ptr;
+       current->prev_lowest_stack = erase_low;
 #endif
 
        /*
-        * Now write the poison value to the kernel stack. Start from
-        * 'kstack_ptr' and move up till the new 'boundary'. We assume that
-        * the stack pointer doesn't change when we write poison.
+        * Now write the poison value to the kernel stack between 'erase_low'
+        * and 'erase_high'. We assume that the stack pointer doesn't change
+        * when we write poison.
         */
        if (on_thread_stack())
-               boundary = current_stack_pointer;
+               erase_high = current_stack_pointer;
        else
-               boundary = current_top_of_stack();
+               erase_high = current_top_of_stack();
 
-       while (kstack_ptr < boundary) {
-               *(unsigned long *)kstack_ptr = STACKLEAK_POISON;
-               kstack_ptr += sizeof(unsigned long);
+       while (erase_low < erase_high) {
+               *(unsigned long *)erase_low = STACKLEAK_POISON;
+               erase_low += sizeof(unsigned long);
        }
 
        /* Reset the 'lowest_stack' value for the next syscall */