GCC9 is confused by this comment when building with CFLAG
-Wimplicit-fallthrough=2:
hw/net/imx_fec.c: In function ‘imx_eth_write’:
hw/net/imx_fec.c:906:12: error: this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]
906 | if (unlikely(single_tx_ring)) {
| ^
hw/net/imx_fec.c:912:5: note: here
912 | case ENET_TDAR: /* FALLTHROUGH */
| ^~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Rewrite the comments in the correct place, using 'fall through'
which is recognized by GCC and static analyzers.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarkovic@wavecomp.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
20191218192526.13845-5-philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
TYPE_IMX_FEC, __func__);
return;
}
- case ENET_TDAR: /* FALLTHROUGH */
+ /* fall through */
+ case ENET_TDAR:
if (s->regs[ENET_ECR] & ENET_ECR_ETHEREN) {
s->regs[index] = ENET_TDAR_TDAR;
imx_eth_do_tx(s, index);