With the introduction of threaded interrupt handlers, it is virtually
never safe to call disable_irq() from non-premptible context.
Thus: Update the documentation, add an explicit might_sleep() to catch any
offenders. This is more obvious and straight forward than the implicit
might_sleep() check deeper down in the disable_irq() call chain.
Fixes: 3aa551c9b4c4 ("genirq: add threaded interrupt handler support")
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221216150441.200533-3-manfred@colorfullife.com
* to complete before returning. If you use this function while
* holding a resource the IRQ handler may need you will deadlock.
*
- * This function may be called - with care - from IRQ context.
+ * Can only be called from preemptible code as it might sleep when
+ * an interrupt thread is associated to @irq.
+ *
*/
void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
+ might_sleep();
if (!__disable_irq_nosync(irq))
synchronize_irq(irq);
}