-EPERM or -EINVAL always get converted to -EOPNOTSUPP, so replace them.
This will allow __hw_perf_event_init() to return a different code or not
print that particular message for a different error in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211161331.1277825-10-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
{
unsigned long config_base = 0;
- if (attr->exclude_idle)
- return -EPERM;
+ if (attr->exclude_idle) {
+ pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support mode exclusion\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
if (attr->exclude_user)
config_base |= ARMV7_EXCLUDE_USER;
if (attr->exclude_kernel)
{
unsigned long config_base = 0;
- if (!attr->exclude_guest)
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!attr->exclude_guest) {
+ pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support mode exclusion\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
if (!attr->exclude_kernel)
config_base |= M1_PMU_CFG_COUNT_KERNEL;
if (!attr->exclude_user)
{
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
- int mapping;
+ int mapping, ret;
hwc->flags = 0;
mapping = armpmu->map_event(event);
/*
* Check whether we need to exclude the counter from certain modes.
*/
- if (armpmu->set_event_filter &&
- armpmu->set_event_filter(hwc, &event->attr)) {
- pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support "
- "mode exclusion\n");
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (armpmu->set_event_filter) {
+ ret = armpmu->set_event_filter(hwc, &event->attr);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
/*
{
unsigned long config_base = 0;
- if (attr->exclude_idle)
- return -EPERM;
+ if (attr->exclude_idle) {
+ pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support mode exclusion\n");
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
/*
* If we're running in hyp mode, then we *are* the hypervisor.