There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
struct stm32f7_i2c_msg *f7_msg = &i2c_dev->f7_msg;
struct stm32_i2c_dma *dma = i2c_dev->dma;
struct device *dev = i2c_dev->dev;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
int i, ret;
f7_msg->addr = addr;
if (ret)
goto pm_free;
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
- i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&i2c_dev->complete,
+ i2c_dev->adap.timeout);
ret = f7_msg->result;
if (ret) {
if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
goto pm_free;
}
- if (!timeout) {
+ if (!time_left) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Access to slave 0x%x timed out\n", f7_msg->addr);
if (i2c_dev->use_dma)
dmaengine_terminate_sync(dma->chan_using);