Use of a do/while(0) control flow in order to permit an early break
is an unusual paradigm, and triggers a false positive with a planned
future syntax check against 'while (0);'. Rewrite the code to use a
goto instead. This patch temporarily keeps an extra level of
indentation to highlight the change; the next patch cleans it up.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
20171201232433.25193-4-eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
#endif
tcgetattr(fd, &tty);
-#define check_speed(val) if (speed <= val) { spd = B##val; break; }
+#define check_speed(val) \
+ if (speed <= val) { \
+ spd = B##val; \
+ goto done; \
+ }
+
speed = speed * 10 / 11;
- do {
+ {
check_speed(50);
check_speed(75);
check_speed(110);
check_speed(4000000);
#endif
spd = B115200;
- } while (0);
+ }
+#undef check_speed
+ done:
cfsetispeed(&tty, spd);
cfsetospeed(&tty, spd);