The current fns() repeatedly uses __ffs() to find the index of the
least significant bit and then clears the corresponding bit using
__clear_bit(). The method for clearing the least significant bit can be
optimized by using word &= word - 1 instead.
Typically, the execution time of one __ffs() plus one __clear_bit() is
longer than that of a bitwise AND operation and a subtraction. To
improve performance, the loop for clearing the least significant bit
has been replaced with word &= word - 1, followed by a single __ffs()
operation to obtain the answer. This change reduces the number of
__ffs() iterations from n to just one, enhancing overall performance.
This modification significantly accelerates the fns() function in the
test_bitops benchmark, improving its speed by approximately 7.6 times.
Additionally, it enhances the performance of find_nth_bit() in the
find_bit benchmark by approximately 26%.
Before:
test_bitops: fns:
58033164 ns
find_nth_bit:
4254313 ns, 16525 iterations
After:
test_bitops: fns:
7637268 ns
find_nth_bit:
3362863 ns, 16501 iterations
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
*/
static inline unsigned long fns(unsigned long word, unsigned int n)
{
- unsigned int bit;
+ while (word && n--)
+ word &= word - 1;
- while (word) {
- bit = __ffs(word);
- if (n-- == 0)
- return bit;
- __clear_bit(bit, &word);
- }
-
- return BITS_PER_LONG;
+ return word ? __ffs(word) : BITS_PER_LONG;
}
/**