s390/mm,fault: use __ratelimit() instead of printk_ratelimit()

Just like other architectures make use __ratelimit() instead of
printk_ratelimit().

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
index c13999aa052690051a423541f040d8392b535a72..d22a8fe5e4fcc7542b4672d3b240512edc598129 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -218,11 +218,13 @@ int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
 
 void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr, int is_mm_fault)
 {
+       static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+
        if ((task_pid_nr(current) > 1) && !show_unhandled_signals)
                return;
        if (!unhandled_signal(current, signr))
                return;
-       if (!printk_ratelimit())
+       if (!__ratelimit(&rs))
                return;
        printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ",
               regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17);