Documentation: RISC-V: Fix a typo in patch-acceptance
authorPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Wed, 7 Dec 2022 02:08:12 +0000 (18:08 -0800)
committerPalmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:21:42 +0000 (09:21 -0800)
I just stumbled on this when modifying the docs.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221207020815.16214-2-palmer@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst

index dfe0ac5624fb240ce697a5067666cf46b2dc7209..5da6f9b273d6c3fde2e2cd3679cd4429e5ad54c6 100644 (file)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ their own custom extensions.  These custom extensions aren't required
 to go through any review or ratification process by the RISC-V
 Foundation.  To avoid the maintenance complexity and potential
 performance impact of adding kernel code for implementor-specific
-RISC-V extensions, we'll only to accept patches for extensions that
+RISC-V extensions, we'll only accept patches for extensions that
 have been officially frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation.
 (Implementors, may, of course, maintain their own Linux kernel trees
 containing code for any custom extensions that they wish.)