If a vcpu exits for a data abort with an invalid syndrome, the
expectations are that userspace has a chance to save the day if
it has requested to see such exits.
However, this is completely futile in the case of a protected VM,
as none of the state is available. In this particular case, inject
a data abort directly into the vcpu, consistent with what userspace
could do.
This also helps with pKVM, which discards all syndrome information when
forwarding data aborts that are not known to be MMIO.
Finally, document this tweak to the API.
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423150538.2103045-31-tabba@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
KVM_EXIT_MMIO, but userspace has to emulate any change to the processing state
if it decides to decode and emulate the instruction.
+This feature isn't available to protected VMs, as userspace does not
+have access to the state that is required to perform the emulation.
+Instead, a data abort exception is directly injected in the guest.
+Note that although KVM_CAP_ARM_NISV_TO_USER will be reported if
+queried outside of a protected VM context, the feature will not be
+exposed if queried on a protected VM file descriptor.
+
::
/* KVM_EXIT_X86_RDMSR / KVM_EXIT_X86_WRMSR */
/*
* No valid syndrome? Ask userspace for help if it has
* volunteered to do so, and bail out otherwise.
+ *
+ * In the protected VM case, there isn't much userspace can do
+ * though, so directly deliver an exception to the guest.
*/
if (!kvm_vcpu_dabt_isvalid(vcpu)) {
trace_kvm_mmio_nisv(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu),
kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu), fault_ipa);
+ if (vcpu_is_protected(vcpu)) {
+ kvm_inject_dabt(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu));
+ return 1;
+ }
+
if (test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_RETURN_NISV_IO_ABORT_TO_USER,
&vcpu->kvm->arch.flags)) {
run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_ARM_NISV;