rcu: Don't flag non-starting GPs before GP kthread is running
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:30:22 +0000 (12:30 -0800)
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Thu, 20 Feb 2020 23:58:23 +0000 (15:58 -0800)
Currently rcu_check_gp_start_stall() complains if a grace period takes
too long to start, where "too long" is roughly one RCU CPU stall-warning
interval.  This has worked well, but there are some debugging Kconfig
options (such as CONFIG_EFI_PGT_DUMP=y) that can make booting take a
very long time, so much so that the stall-warning interval has expired
before RCU's grace-period kthread has even been spawned.

This commit therefore resets the rcu_state.gp_req_activity and
rcu_state.gp_activity timestamps just before the grace-period kthread
is spawned, and modifies the checks and adds ordering to ensure that
if rcu_check_gp_start_stall() sees that the grace-period kthread
has been spawned, that it will also see the resets applied to the
rcu_state.gp_req_activity and rcu_state.gp_activity timestamps.

Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ paulmck: Fix whitespace issues reported by Qian Cai. ]
Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
[ paulmck: Simplify grace-period wakeup check per Steve Rostedt feedback. ]

kernel/rcu/tree.c
kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h

index 62383ce5161f8c23fb7f6c74d30663ab19b89e15..4a4a975503e52aad42b7882907847933e3ab5ffe 100644 (file)
@@ -1202,7 +1202,7 @@ static bool rcu_start_this_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp_start, struct rcu_data *rdp,
        trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("Startedroot"));
        WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags, rcu_state.gp_flags | RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT);
        WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_req_activity, jiffies);
-       if (!rcu_state.gp_kthread) {
+       if (!READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_kthread)) {
                trace_rcu_this_gp(rnp, rdp, gp_seq_req, TPS("NoGPkthread"));
                goto unlock_out;
        }
@@ -1237,12 +1237,13 @@ static bool rcu_future_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_node *rnp)
 }
 
 /*
- * Awaken the grace-period kthread.  Don't do a self-awaken (unless in
- * an interrupt or softirq handler), and don't bother awakening when there
- * is nothing for the grace-period kthread to do (as in several CPUs raced
- * to awaken, and we lost), and finally don't try to awaken a kthread that
- * has not yet been created.  If all those checks are passed, track some
- * debug information and awaken.
+ * Awaken the grace-period kthread.  Don't do a self-awaken (unless in an
+ * interrupt or softirq handler, in which case we just might immediately
+ * sleep upon return, resulting in a grace-period hang), and don't bother
+ * awakening when there is nothing for the grace-period kthread to do
+ * (as in several CPUs raced to awaken, we lost), and finally don't try
+ * to awaken a kthread that has not yet been created.  If all those checks
+ * are passed, track some debug information and awaken.
  *
  * So why do the self-wakeup when in an interrupt or softirq handler
  * in the grace-period kthread's context?  Because the kthread might have
@@ -1252,10 +1253,10 @@ static bool rcu_future_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_node *rnp)
  */
 static void rcu_gp_kthread_wake(void)
 {
-       if ((current == rcu_state.gp_kthread &&
-            !in_irq() && !in_serving_softirq()) ||
-           !READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags) ||
-           !rcu_state.gp_kthread)
+       struct task_struct *t = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_kthread);
+
+       if ((current == t && !in_irq() && !in_serving_softirq()) ||
+           !READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags) || !t)
                return;
        WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_time, jiffies);
        WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_seq, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq));
@@ -3554,7 +3555,10 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_gp_kthread(void)
        }
        rnp = rcu_get_root();
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
-       rcu_state.gp_kthread = t;
+       WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity, jiffies);
+       WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_req_activity, jiffies);
+       // Reset .gp_activity and .gp_req_activity before setting .gp_kthread.
+       smp_store_release(&rcu_state.gp_kthread, t);  /* ^^^ */
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
        wake_up_process(t);
        rcu_spawn_nocb_kthreads();
index 488b71d0303071c19495d12396e9df01ee791968..16ad7ad9a1859c87dd577f4af7d80075cf4ab363 100644 (file)
@@ -578,6 +578,7 @@ void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void)
        unsigned long jw;
        struct rcu_data *rdp;
        struct rcu_node *rnp;
+       struct task_struct *t = READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_kthread);
 
        j = jiffies;
        ja = j - READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_activity);
@@ -585,8 +586,7 @@ void show_rcu_gp_kthreads(void)
        jw = j - READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_time);
        pr_info("%s: wait state: %s(%d) ->state: %#lx delta ->gp_activity %lu ->gp_req_activity %lu ->gp_wake_time %lu ->gp_wake_seq %ld ->gp_seq %ld ->gp_seq_needed %ld ->gp_flags %#x\n",
                rcu_state.name, gp_state_getname(rcu_state.gp_state),
-               rcu_state.gp_state,
-               rcu_state.gp_kthread ? rcu_state.gp_kthread->state : 0x1ffffL,
+               rcu_state.gp_state, t ? t->state : 0x1ffffL,
                ja, jr, jw, (long)READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_wake_seq),
                (long)READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_seq),
                (long)READ_ONCE(rcu_get_root()->gp_seq_needed),
@@ -633,7 +633,8 @@ static void rcu_check_gp_start_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 
        if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) || rcu_gp_in_progress() ||
            ULONG_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(rnp_root->gp_seq),
-                        READ_ONCE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed)))
+                        READ_ONCE(rnp_root->gp_seq_needed)) ||
+           !smp_load_acquire(&rcu_state.gp_kthread)) // Get stable kthread.
                return;
        j = jiffies; /* Expensive access, and in common case don't get here. */
        if (time_before(j, READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_req_activity) + gpssdelay) ||