extcon: usbc-tusb320: Update state on probe even if no IRQ pending

Currently this driver triggers extcon and typec state update in its
probe function, to read out current state reported by the chip and
report the correct state to upper layers. This synchronization is
performed correctly, but only in case the chip indicates a pending
interrupt in reg09 register.

This fails to cover the situation where all interrupts reported by
the chip were already handled by Linux before reboot, then the system
rebooted, and then Linux starts again. In this case, the TUSB320 no
longer reports any interrupts in reg09, and the state update does not
perform any update as it depends on that interrupt indication.

Fix this by turning tusb320_irq_handler() into a thin wrapper around
tusb320_state_update_handler(), where the later now contains the bulk
of the code of tusb320_irq_handler(), but adds new function parameter
"force_update". The "force_update" parameter can be used by the probe
function to assure that the state synchronization is always performed,
independent of the interrupt indicated in reg09. The interrupt handler
tusb320_irq_handler() callback uses force_update=false to avoid state
updates on potential spurious interrupts and retain current behavior.

Fixes: 06bc4ca115cdd ("extcon: Add driver for TI TUSB320")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120141509.81012-1-marex@denx.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c
index 2a120d8d3c2723525efdaf9a3989997fbb5d058e..9dfa545427ca15ff4f5158753ee3cf7c4f6ee4a0 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c
@@ -313,9 +313,9 @@ static void tusb320_typec_irq_handler(struct tusb320_priv *priv, u8 reg9)
                typec_set_pwr_opmode(port, TYPEC_PWR_MODE_USB);
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t tusb320_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+static irqreturn_t tusb320_state_update_handler(struct tusb320_priv *priv,
+                                               bool force_update)
 {
-       struct tusb320_priv *priv = dev_id;
        unsigned int reg;
 
        if (regmap_read(priv->regmap, TUSB320_REG9, &reg)) {
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tusb320_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
                return IRQ_NONE;
        }
 
-       if (!(reg & TUSB320_REG9_INTERRUPT_STATUS))
+       if (!force_update && !(reg & TUSB320_REG9_INTERRUPT_STATUS))
                return IRQ_NONE;
 
        tusb320_extcon_irq_handler(priv, reg);
@@ -340,6 +340,13 @@ static irqreturn_t tusb320_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
        return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
+static irqreturn_t tusb320_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+       struct tusb320_priv *priv = dev_id;
+
+       return tusb320_state_update_handler(priv, false);
+}
+
 static const struct regmap_config tusb320_regmap_config = {
        .reg_bits = 8,
        .val_bits = 8,
@@ -466,7 +473,7 @@ static int tusb320_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
                return ret;
 
        /* update initial state */
-       tusb320_irq_handler(client->irq, priv);
+       tusb320_state_update_handler(priv, true);
 
        /* Reset chip to its default state */
        ret = tusb320_reset(priv);
@@ -477,7 +484,7 @@ static int tusb320_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
                 * State and polarity might change after a reset, so update
                 * them again and make sure the interrupt status bit is cleared.
                 */
-               tusb320_irq_handler(client->irq, priv);
+               tusb320_state_update_handler(priv, true);
 
        ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(priv->dev, client->irq, NULL,
                                        tusb320_irq_handler,