bpf: Do not try bpf_msg_push_data with len 0

commit 4a11678f683814df82fca9018d964771e02d7e6d upstream.

If bpf_msg_push_data() is called with len 0 (as it happens during
selftests/bpf/test_sockmap), we do not need to do anything and can
return early.

Calling bpf_msg_push_data() with len 0 previously lead to a wrong ENOMEM
error: we later called get_order(copy + len); if len was 0, copy + len
was also often 0 and get_order() returned some undefined value (at the
moment 52). alloc_pages() caught that and failed, but then bpf_msg_push_data()
returned ENOMEM. This was wrong because we are most probably not out of
memory and actually do not need any additional memory.

Fixes: 6fff607e2f14b ("bpf: sk_msg program helper bpf_msg_push_data")
Signed-off-by: Felix Maurer <fmaurer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/df69012695c7094ccb1943ca02b4920db3537466.1644421921.git.fmaurer@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index f207e4782bd0ef581af12fe4a185f25b398a1f20..76e406965b6f98a9f3d98f156ae16ed23a8874a2 100644 (file)
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2711,6 +2711,9 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_msg_push_data, struct sk_msg *, msg, u32, start,
        if (unlikely(flags))
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       if (unlikely(len == 0))
+               return 0;
+
        /* First find the starting scatterlist element */
        i = msg->sg.start;
        do {