A previous patch addressed the fortified memcpy warning for most
builds, but I still see this one with gcc-9:
In file included from include/linux/string.h:254,
from drivers/hid/hid-hyperv.c:8:
In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
inlined from 'mousevsc_on_receive' at drivers/hid/hid-hyperv.c:272:3:
include/linux/fortify-string.h:583:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
583 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My guess is that the WARN_ON() itself is what confuses gcc, so it no
longer sees that there is a correct range check. Rework the code in a
way that helps readability and avoids the warning.
Fixes: 542f25a94471 ("HID: hyperv: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230705140242.844167-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
switch (hid_msg_hdr->type) {
case SYNTH_HID_PROTOCOL_RESPONSE:
+ len = struct_size(pipe_msg, data, pipe_msg->size);
+
/*
* While it will be impossible for us to protect against
* malicious/buggy hypervisor/host, add a check here to
* ensure we don't corrupt memory.
*/
- if (struct_size(pipe_msg, data, pipe_msg->size)
- > sizeof(struct mousevsc_prt_msg)) {
- WARN_ON(1);
+ if (WARN_ON(len > sizeof(struct mousevsc_prt_msg)))
break;
- }
- memcpy(&input_dev->protocol_resp, pipe_msg,
- struct_size(pipe_msg, data, pipe_msg->size));
+ memcpy(&input_dev->protocol_resp, pipe_msg, len);
complete(&input_dev->wait_event);
break;