mm, isolation: avoid checking unmovable pages across pageblock boundary
authorLi Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Tue, 13 Oct 2020 23:55:39 +0000 (16:55 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 14 Oct 2020 01:38:33 +0000 (18:38 -0700)
In has_unmovable_pages(), the page parameter would not always be the first
page within a pageblock (see how the page pointer is passed in from
start_isolate_page_range() after call __first_valid_page()), so that would
cause checking unmovable pages span two pageblocks.

After this patch, the checking is enforced within one pageblock no matter
the page is first one or not, and obey the semantics of this function.

This issue is found by code inspection.

Michal said "this might lead to false negatives when an unrelated block
would cause an isolation failure".

Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824065811.383266-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/page_alloc.c

index ff0b14b0e8d7e76c3100b0f1b4902da704b69e1e..b9f9b51e0342aee473861dad8c27b549a961482d 100644 (file)
@@ -8234,6 +8234,7 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
 {
        unsigned long iter = 0;
        unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
+       unsigned long offset = pfn % pageblock_nr_pages;
 
        if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
                /*
@@ -8247,7 +8248,7 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page,
                return page;
        }
 
-       for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) {
+       for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages - offset; iter++) {
                if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter))
                        continue;