LoongArch: BPF: Fix sign-extension mov instructions
authorTiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Sat, 9 Dec 2023 07:49:16 +0000 (15:49 +0800)
committerHuacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Sat, 9 Dec 2023 07:49:16 +0000 (15:49 +0800)
We can see that "Short form of movsx, dst_reg = (s8,s16,s32)src_reg" in
include/linux/filter.h, additionally, for BPF_ALU64 the value of the
destination register is unchanged whereas for BPF_ALU the upper 32 bits
of the destination register are zeroed, so it should clear the upper 32
bits for BPF_ALU.

[root@linux fedora]# echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
[root@linux fedora]# modprobe test_bpf

Before:
test_bpf: #81 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

After:
test_bpf: #81 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 6 PASS
test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 6 PASS

By the way, the bpf selftest case "./test_progs -t verifier_movsx" can
also be fixed with this patch.

Fixes: f48012f16150 ("LoongArch: BPF: Support sign-extension mov instructions")
Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c

index d76281efc5b8beaa889b88bc6e491b0b70b3e19e..cd002f183648f0c22e738fdc87019be1c032a2e0 100644 (file)
@@ -480,10 +480,12 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
                case 8:
                        move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
                        emit_insn(ctx, extwb, dst, t1);
+                       emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
                        break;
                case 16:
                        move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
                        emit_insn(ctx, extwh, dst, t1);
+                       emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
                        break;
                case 32:
                        emit_insn(ctx, addw, dst, src, LOONGARCH_GPR_ZERO);