drm/xe: Fix bounds checking in __xe_bo_placement_for_flags()

Requesting all memory regions on PVC will fill bo->placements up to
XE_BO_MAX_PLACEMENTS. The subsequent call to try_add_stolen() will trip
over the bounds checking even though XE_PL_STOLEN is not expected to
be used in this case.

This is hit with igt@xe_exec_fault_mode@once-basic-prefetch:
    xe 0000:8c:00.0: [drm] Assertion `*c < (sizeof(bo->placements) / sizeof((bo->placements)[0]) + ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(__builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof((bo->placements)), typeof(&(bo->placements)[0])))); }))))` failed!
    WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 6161 at drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:203 __xe_bo_placement_for_flags+0x218/0x240 [xe]

Is fixed here by moving the bounds checks closer to where we actually
write into the bo->placement array.

Fixes: 8c54ee8a8606 ("drm/xe: Ensure that we don't access the placements array out-of-bounds")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240111002111.10190-1-brian.welty@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 52e3fa3e3ea3ee05e32c1a8d72bb3ae306a4da64)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 3cd29bd015a02e1f409ceb9642c185d77d654250..0b0e262e2166d69da1063915fa4c6eeedfd38bd6 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ static struct xe_mem_region *res_to_mem_region(struct ttm_resource *res)
 static void try_add_system(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
                           u32 bo_flags, u32 *c)
 {
-       xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
-
        if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_SYSTEM_BIT) {
+               xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
+
                bo->placements[*c] = (struct ttm_place) {
                        .mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
                };
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ static void add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
        struct xe_mem_region *vram;
        u64 io_size;
 
+       xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
+
        vram = to_xe_ttm_vram_mgr(ttm_manager_type(&xe->ttm, mem_type))->vram;
        xe_assert(xe, vram && vram->usable_size);
        io_size = vram->io_size;
@@ -175,8 +177,6 @@ static void add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
 static void try_add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
                         u32 bo_flags, u32 *c)
 {
-       xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
-
        if (bo->props.preferred_gt == XE_GT1) {
                if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_VRAM1_BIT)
                        add_vram(xe, bo, bo->placements, bo_flags, XE_PL_VRAM1, c);
@@ -193,9 +193,9 @@ static void try_add_vram(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
 static void try_add_stolen(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
                           u32 bo_flags, u32 *c)
 {
-       xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
-
        if (bo_flags & XE_BO_CREATE_STOLEN_BIT) {
+               xe_assert(xe, *c < ARRAY_SIZE(bo->placements));
+
                bo->placements[*c] = (struct ttm_place) {
                        .mem_type = XE_PL_STOLEN,
                        .flags = bo_flags & (XE_BO_CREATE_PINNED_BIT |