The "prot" parameter is unused, and using it instead of what's stored in
that particular PTE would very likely be wrong. Let's simply remove it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240327143301.741807-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
#ifdef DCACHE_ALIASING_POSSIBLE
#define __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
-#define move_pte(pte, prot, old_addr, new_addr) \
+#define move_pte(pte, old_addr, new_addr) \
({ \
pte_t newpte = (pte); \
if (tlb_type != hypervisor && pte_present(pte)) { \
#endif
#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_MOVE_PTE
-#define move_pte(pte, prot, old_addr, new_addr) (pte)
+#define move_pte(pte, old_addr, new_addr) (pte)
#endif
#ifndef pte_accessible
*/
if (pte_present(pte))
force_flush = true;
- pte = move_pte(pte, new_vma->vm_page_prot, old_addr, new_addr);
+ pte = move_pte(pte, old_addr, new_addr);
pte = move_soft_dirty_pte(pte);
set_pte_at(mm, new_addr, new_pte, pte);
}