soc: ti: pruss: Remove wrong check against *get_match_data return value

Since the of_device_get_match_data() doesn't return error code, remove
wrong IS_ERR test. Proper check against NULL pointer is already done
later before usage: if (data && data->...).

Additionally, proceeding with empty device data is valid (e.g. in case
of "ti,am3356-pruss").

Reported-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
index cc0b4ad7a3d34fb06654f0f04c2ef37c12d496a7..5d6e7132a5c4141ac6f1132e908689cddf5430af 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/pruss.c
@@ -126,8 +126,6 @@ static int pruss_clk_init(struct pruss *pruss, struct device_node *cfg_node)
        int ret = 0;
 
        data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
-       if (IS_ERR(data))
-               return -ENODEV;
 
        clks_np = of_get_child_by_name(cfg_node, "clocks");
        if (!clks_np) {
@@ -175,10 +173,6 @@ static int pruss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        const char *mem_names[PRUSS_MEM_MAX] = { "dram0", "dram1", "shrdram2" };
 
        data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
-       if (IS_ERR(data)) {
-               dev_err(dev, "missing private data\n");
-               return -ENODEV;
-       }
 
        ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
        if (ret) {