bcachefs: fix btree iterator bug when using depth > 0
authorKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:59:07 +0000 (02:59 -0500)
committerKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Sun, 22 Oct 2023 21:08:12 +0000 (17:08 -0400)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c

index ea37fa21ed6ed584086ad4ecd758697f4bfdc085..a50a6a51a3a5482d8ebfcb67908a0ccd3c7fc2cf 100644 (file)
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static inline int btree_iter_lock_root(struct btree_iter *iter,
                         */
                        iter->level = depth_want;
                        iter->l[iter->level].b = NULL;
-                       return 0;
+                       return 1;
                }
 
                lock_type = __btree_lock_want(iter, iter->level);
@@ -1045,6 +1045,9 @@ int __must_check __bch2_btree_iter_traverse(struct btree_iter *iter)
                        ? btree_iter_down(iter)
                        : btree_iter_lock_root(iter, depth_want);
                if (unlikely(ret)) {
+                       if (ret == 1)
+                               return 0;
+
                        iter->level = depth_want;
                        iter->l[iter->level].b = BTREE_ITER_NOT_END;
                        return ret;