With patch set [1], precision backtracing supports register spill/fill
to/from the stack. The patch [2] allows initial imprecise register spill
with content 0. This is a common case for cpuv3 and lower for
initializing the stack variables with pattern
r1 = 0
*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1
and the [2] has demonstrated good verification improvement.
For cpuv4, the initialization could be
*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0
The current verifier marks the r10-8 contents with STACK_ZERO.
Similar to [2], let us permit the above insn to behave like
imprecise register spill which can reduce number of verified states.
The change is in function check_stack_write_fixed_off().
Before this patch, spilled zero will be marked as STACK_ZERO
which can provide precise values. In check_stack_write_var_off(),
STACK_ZERO will be maintained if writing a const zero
so later it can provide precise values if needed.
The above handling of '*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0' as a spill
will have issues in check_stack_write_var_off() as the spill
will be converted to STACK_MISC and the precise value 0
is lost. To fix this issue, if the spill slots with const
zero and the BPF_ST write also with const zero, the spill slots
are preserved, which can later provide precise values
if needed. Without the change in check_stack_write_var_off(),
the test_verifier subtest 'BPF_ST_MEM stack imm zero, variable offset'
will fail.
I checked cpuv3 and cpuv4 with and without this patch with veristat.
There is no state change for cpuv3 since '*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 0'
is only generated with cpuv4.
For cpuv4:
$ ../veristat -C old.cpuv4.csv new.cpuv4.csv -e file,prog,insns,states -f 'insns_diff!=0'
File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF)
------------------------------------------ ------------------- --------- --------- --------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
local_storage_bench.bpf.linked3.o get_local 228 168 -60 (-26.32%) 17 14 -3 (-17.65%)
pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.linked3.o on_event 6066 4889 -1177 (-19.40%) 403 321 -82 (-20.35%)
test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 35483 35387 -96 (-0.27%) 2179 2177 -2 (-0.09%)
test_l4lb_noinline.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress 4494 4522 +28 (+0.62%) 217 219 +2 (+0.92%)
test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress 1432 1455 +23 (+1.61%) 92 94 +2 (+2.17%)
test_xdp_noinline.bpf.linked3.o balancer_ingress_v6 3462 3458 -4 (-0.12%) 216 216 +0 (+0.00%)
verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.linked3.o widening 52 41 -11 (-21.15%) 4 3 -1 (-25.00%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 12412 11719 -693 (-5.58%) 345 330 -15 (-4.35%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 12478 11794 -684 (-5.48%) 346 331 -15 (-4.34%)
test_l4lb_noinline and test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr has minor regression, but
pyperf600_bpf_loop and local_storage_bench gets pretty good improvement.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/
20231205184248.
1502704-1-andrii@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/
20231205184248.
1502704-9-andrii@kernel.org/
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Tested-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240110051348.2737007-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
if (!reg_value_fits)
state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id = 0;
} else if (!reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && is_bpf_st_mem(insn) &&
- insn->imm != 0 && env->bpf_capable) {
+ env->bpf_capable) {
struct bpf_reg_state fake_reg = {};
__mark_reg_known(&fake_reg, insn->imm);
return -EINVAL;
}
- /* Erase all spilled pointers. */
+ /* If writing_zero and the spi slot contains a spill of value 0,
+ * maintain the spill type.
+ */
+ if (writing_zero && *stype == STACK_SPILL &&
+ is_spilled_scalar_reg(&state->stack[spi])) {
+ struct bpf_reg_state *spill_reg = &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr;
+
+ if (tnum_is_const(spill_reg->var_off) && spill_reg->var_off.value == 0) {
+ zero_used = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Erase all other spilled pointers. */
state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.type = NOT_INIT;
/* Update the slot type. */
SEC("raw_tp")
__log_level(2)
__success
-/* make sure fp-8 is all STACK_ZERO */
-__msg("2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 ; R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000")
+/* fp-8 is spilled IMPRECISE value zero (represented by a zero value fake reg) */
+__msg("2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0 ; R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0")
/* but fp-16 is spilled IMPRECISE zero const reg */
__msg("4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0 ; R0_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-16_w=0")
-/* validate that assigning R2 from STACK_ZERO doesn't mark register
+/* validate that assigning R2 from STACK_SPILL with zero value doesn't mark register
* precise immediately; if necessary, it will be marked precise later
*/
-__msg("6: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r10 -1) ; R2_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000")
+__msg("6: (71) r2 = *(u8 *)(r10 -1) ; R2_w=0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=0")
/* similarly, when R2 is assigned from spilled register, it is initially
* imprecise, but will be marked precise later once it is used in precise context
*/
__naked void partial_stack_load_preserves_zeros(void)
{
asm volatile (
- /* fp-8 is all STACK_ZERO */
+ /* fp-8 is value zero (represented by a zero value fake reg) */
".8byte %[fp8_st_zero];" /* LLVM-18+: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0; */
/* fp-16 is const zero register */
"r0 = 0;"
"*(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0;"
- /* load single U8 from non-aligned STACK_ZERO slot */
+ /* load single U8 from non-aligned spilled value zero slot */
"r1 = %[single_byte_buf];"
"r2 = *(u8 *)(r10 -1);"
"r1 += r2;"
"r1 += r2;"
"*(u8 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;" /* this should be fine */
- /* load single U16 from non-aligned STACK_ZERO slot */
+ /* load single U16 from non-aligned spilled value zero slot */
"r1 = %[single_byte_buf];"
"r2 = *(u16 *)(r10 -2);"
"r1 += r2;"
"r1 += r2;"
"*(u8 *)(r1 + 0) = r2;" /* this should be fine */
- /* load single U32 from non-aligned STACK_ZERO slot */
+ /* load single U32 from non-aligned spilled value zero slot */
"r1 = %[single_byte_buf];"
"r2 = *(u32 *)(r10 -4);"
"r1 += r2;"