drm/i915: Propagate errors on awaiting already signaled fences
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 6 Dec 2019 16:04:27 +0000 (16:04 +0000)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:09:40 +0000 (19:09 +0000)
If we see an already signaled fence that we want to await on, we skip
adding to the i915_sw_fence. However, we should pay attention to whether
there was an error on that fence and if so propagate it for our future
request.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191206160428.1503343-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c

index a558f64186fa6c67b2cc613a775902015e6d51d7..3fa1650975b8cbffefef646f3cf661db78073cd2 100644 (file)
@@ -958,8 +958,10 @@ i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence)
 
        do {
                fence = *child++;
-               if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
+               if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)) {
+                       i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&rq->submit, fence->error);
                        continue;
+               }
 
                /*
                 * Requests on the same timeline are explicitly ordered, along
@@ -1015,8 +1017,10 @@ i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq,
 
        do {
                fence = *child++;
-               if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
+               if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags)) {
+                       i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&rq->submit, fence->error);
                        continue;
+               }
 
                /*
                 * We don't squash repeated fence dependencies here as we