The upcoming patch to allow extents to span btree nodes will require
this... and this assertion seems to be popping, and it's not a very good
assertion anyways.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
}
trans_for_each_update2(trans, i) {
- BUG_ON(i->iter->uptodate > BTREE_ITER_NEED_PEEK);
BUG_ON(i->iter->locks_want < 1);
+ ret = bch2_btree_iter_traverse(i->iter);
+ if (unlikely(ret)) {
+ trace_trans_restart_traverse(trans->ip);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
u64s = jset_u64s(i->k->k.u64s);
if (btree_iter_type(i->iter) == BTREE_ITER_CACHED &&
likely(!(trans->flags & BTREE_INSERT_JOURNAL_REPLAY)))