drm/vc4: hdmi: Disable Wifi Frequencies
authorMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:40:17 +0000 (14:40 +0100)
committerMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Thu, 19 Nov 2020 14:46:08 +0000 (15:46 +0100)
There's cross-talk on the RPi4 between the 2.4GHz channels used by the WiFi
chip and some resolutions, most notably 1440p at 60Hz.

In such a case, we can either reject entirely the mode, or lower slightly
the pixel frequency to remove the overlap. Let's go for the latter.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201029134018.1948636-2-maxime@cerno.tech
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.h

index 4689a7338ac56722dcebd7d5fcf884a692ee852e..afc178b0d89f47fb286dc21c134e6013bf5b8fda 100644 (file)
@@ -760,6 +760,9 @@ static void vc4_hdmi_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
 {
 }
 
+#define WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MIN_FREQ       2400000000ULL
+#define WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MAX_FREQ       2422000000ULL
+
 static int vc4_hdmi_encoder_atomic_check(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
                                         struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
                                         struct drm_connector_state *conn_state)
@@ -767,12 +770,27 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_encoder_atomic_check(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
        struct drm_display_mode *mode = &crtc_state->adjusted_mode;
        struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi = encoder_to_vc4_hdmi(encoder);
        unsigned long long pixel_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
+       unsigned long long tmds_rate;
 
        if (vc4_hdmi->variant->unsupported_odd_h_timings &&
            ((mode->hdisplay % 2) || (mode->hsync_start % 2) ||
             (mode->hsync_end % 2) || (mode->htotal % 2)))
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       /*
+        * The 1440p@60 pixel rate is in the same range than the first
+        * WiFi channel (between 2.4GHz and 2.422GHz with 22MHz
+        * bandwidth). Slightly lower the frequency to bring it out of
+        * the WiFi range.
+        */
+       tmds_rate = pixel_rate * 10;
+       if (vc4_hdmi->disable_wifi_frequencies &&
+           (tmds_rate >= WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MIN_FREQ &&
+            tmds_rate <= WIFI_2_4GHz_CH1_MAX_FREQ)) {
+               mode->clock = 238560;
+               pixel_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
+       }
+
        if (pixel_rate > vc4_hdmi->variant->max_pixel_clock)
                return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1719,6 +1737,9 @@ static int vc4_hdmi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
                vc4_hdmi->hpd_active_low = hpd_gpio_flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
        }
 
+       vc4_hdmi->disable_wifi_frequencies =
+               of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "wifi-2.4ghz-coexistence");
+
        pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 
        drm_simple_encoder_init(drm, encoder, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_TMDS);
index 6815e93b1a4834852502e54832f672eb95d26c1d..0526a9cf608a3b5fb242de70353a91199ad1b40f 100644 (file)
@@ -142,6 +142,14 @@ struct vc4_hdmi {
        int hpd_gpio;
        bool hpd_active_low;
 
+       /*
+        * On some systems (like the RPi4), some modes are in the same
+        * frequency range than the WiFi channels (1440p@60Hz for
+        * example). Should we take evasive actions because that system
+        * has a wifi adapter?
+        */
+       bool disable_wifi_frequencies;
+
        struct cec_adapter *cec_adap;
        struct cec_msg cec_rx_msg;
        bool cec_tx_ok;