->d_lock on parent does not stabilize ->d_inode of child.
We don't do much with that inode in there, but we need
at least to avoid struct inode getting freed under us...
[rcu_read_lock() is not needed here, since parent's ->d_lock
provides an rcu-critical area]
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
list_for_each_entry(de, &parent->d_subdirs, d_child) {
+ struct inode *inode = d_inode_rcu(de);
/* don't know what to do with negative dentries */
- if (d_inode(de) )
- coda_flag_inode(d_inode(de), flag);
+ if (inode)
+ coda_flag_inode(inode, flag);
}
spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
- return;
}
void coda_flag_inode_children(struct inode *inode, int flag)