There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
struct i2c_msg *msg, int stop, bool polling)
{
struct omap_i2c_dev *omap = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
- unsigned long timeout;
+ unsigned long time_left;
u16 w;
int ret;
* into arbitration and we're currently unable to recover from it.
*/
if (!polling) {
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&omap->cmd_complete,
- OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
+ time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&omap->cmd_complete,
+ OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
} else {
do {
omap_i2c_wait(omap);
ret = omap_i2c_xfer_data(omap);
} while (ret == -EAGAIN);
- timeout = !ret;
+ time_left = !ret;
}
- if (timeout == 0) {
+ if (time_left == 0) {
omap_i2c_reset(omap);
__omap_i2c_init(omap);
return -ETIMEDOUT;