docs: Fix the reference labels in Locking.rst

Two jump tags were misspelled, leading to non-working cross-reference
links.

Reported-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
index f937c0fd11aaa5968b1fa13e3c8b63f41f98c499..9cc036ff57b94105afb10055e62f5703076546c1 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ perfect world).
 
 Note that you can also use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()` or
 :c:func:`spin_lock_irqsave()` here, which stop hardware interrupts
-as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hardirq-context>`__.
+as well: see `Hard IRQ Context <#hard-irq-context>`__.
 
 This works perfectly for UP as well: the spin lock vanishes, and this
 macro simply becomes :c:func:`local_bh_disable()`
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ The Same Softirq
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 The same softirq can run on the other CPUs: you can use a per-CPU array
-(see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu>`__) for better performance. If you're
+(see `Per-CPU Data <#per-cpu-data>`__) for better performance. If you're
 going so far as to use a softirq, you probably care about scalable
 performance enough to justify the extra complexity.