doc: seq_file: clarify role of *pos in ->next()

There are behavioural requirements on the seq_file next() function in
terms of how it updates *pos at end-of-file, and these are now enforced
by a warning.

I was recently attempting to justify the reason this was needed, and
couldn't remember the details, and didn't find them in the
documentation.

So I re-read the code until I understood it again, and updated the
documentation to match.

I also enhanced the text about SEQ_START_TOKEN as it seemed potentially
misleading.

Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eemqiazh.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
index 7f7ee06b26939f159558858f44fc8d74bf5deb36..56856481dc8d8e2ee3abf2652bc6485c69ef8263 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/seq_file.rst
@@ -129,7 +129,9 @@ also a special value which can be returned by the start() function
 called SEQ_START_TOKEN; it can be used if you wish to instruct your
 show() function (described below) to print a header at the top of the
 output. SEQ_START_TOKEN should only be used if the offset is zero,
-however.
+however.  SEQ_START_TOKEN has no special meaning to the core seq_file
+code.  It is provided as a convenience for a start() funciton to
+communicate with the next() and show() functions.
 
 The next function to implement is called, amazingly, next(); its job is to
 move the iterator forward to the next position in the sequence.  The
@@ -145,6 +147,22 @@ complete. Here's the example version::
                return spos;
        }
 
+The next() function should set ``*pos`` to a value that start() can use
+to find the new location in the sequence.  When the iterator is being
+stored in the private data area, rather than being reinitialized on each
+start(), it might seem sufficient to simply set ``*pos`` to any non-zero
+value (zero always tells start() to restart the sequence).  This is not
+sufficient due to historical problems.
+
+Historically, many next() functions have *not* updated ``*pos`` at
+end-of-file.  If the value is then used by start() to initialise the
+iterator, this can result in corner cases where the last entry in the
+sequence is reported twice in the file.  In order to discourage this bug
+from being resurrected, the core seq_file code now produces a warning if
+a next() function does not change the value of ``*pos``.  Consequently a
+next() function *must* change the value of ``*pos``, and of course must
+set it to a non-zero value.
+
 The stop() function closes a session; its job, of course, is to clean
 up. If dynamic memory is allocated for the iterator, stop() is the
 place to free it; if a lock was taken by start(), stop() must release