There are 2 deficiencies here:
- mirror_iteration could start several requests inside. Thus we could
simply have more in_flight requests than MAX_IN_FLIGHT.
- keeping this in mind throttling in mirror_run which is checking
s->in_flight == MAX_IN_FLIGHT is wrong.
The patch adds the check and throttling into mirror_iteration and fixes
the check in mirror_run() to be sure.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Message-id:
1466598927-5990-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org
CC: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit
e648dc95c28fbca12e67be26a1fc4b9a0676c3fe)
}
}
+ while (s->in_flight >= MAX_IN_FLIGHT) {
+ trace_mirror_yield_in_flight(s, sector_num, s->in_flight);
+ mirror_wait_for_io(s);
+ }
+
mirror_clip_sectors(s, sector_num, &io_sectors);
switch (mirror_method) {
case MIRROR_METHOD_COPY:
delta = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME) - s->last_pause_ns;
if (delta < SLICE_TIME &&
s->common.iostatus == BLOCK_DEVICE_IO_STATUS_OK) {
- if (s->in_flight == MAX_IN_FLIGHT || s->buf_free_count == 0 ||
+ if (s->in_flight >= MAX_IN_FLIGHT || s->buf_free_count == 0 ||
(cnt == 0 && s->in_flight > 0)) {
trace_mirror_yield(s, s->in_flight, s->buf_free_count, cnt);
mirror_wait_for_io(s);