The check for whether locking a btree node would deadlock was wrong - we
have to check that interior nodes are locked before descendents, but
this check was wrong when consider cached vs. non cached iterators.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
* we're about to lock, it must have the ancestors locked too:
*/
if (linked->btree_id == iter->btree_id &&
+ btree_iter_is_cached(linked) == btree_iter_is_cached(iter) &&
level > __fls(linked->nodes_locked)) {
if (!(trans->nounlock)) {
linked->locks_want =
return iter->flags & BTREE_ITER_TYPE;
}
+static inline bool btree_iter_is_cached(const struct btree_iter *iter)
+{
+ return btree_iter_type(iter) == BTREE_ITER_CACHED;
+}
+
static inline struct btree_iter_level *iter_l(struct btree_iter *iter)
{
return iter->l + iter->level;