selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg
authorMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:19:24 +0000 (16:19 +0100)
committerWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:33:04 +0000 (16:33 +0100)
We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via
the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which
wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests
we execute. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c

index d48d3ee1bc36e613f3a0598306e898eb3884ace9..9d6ac843e651768e150fc601d5375564febea08a 100644 (file)
@@ -329,12 +329,9 @@ static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data)
                return;
        }
 
-       if (cur_vl != data->rdvl())
-               ksft_test_result_pass("%s current VL is %d\n",
-                                     data->name, ret);
-       else
-               ksft_test_result_fail("%s prctl() VL %d but RDVL is %d\n",
-                                     data->name, ret, data->rdvl());
+       ksft_test_result(cur_vl == data->rdvl(),
+                        "%s set VL %d and have VL %d\n",
+                        data->name, cur_vl, data->rdvl());
 }
 
 /* Can we set a new VL for this process? */
@@ -555,6 +552,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = {
        proc_write_max,
 
        prctl_get,
+       prctl_set_same,
        prctl_set,
        prctl_set_no_child,
        prctl_set_for_child,