iwlwifi: dvm: excessive if in rs_bt_update_lq()

There is no need to check 'priv->bt_ant_couple_ok' twice in
rs_bt_update_lq(). The second check is always true. Thus, the
expression can be simplified.

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index 74229fcb63a91204ce718e683c77e7c7faf94fa1..226165db7dfd5bfc46007192512993c0864f75be 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx,
                 * Is there a need to switch between
                 * full concurrency and 3-wire?
                 */
-               if (priv->bt_ci_compliance && priv->bt_ant_couple_ok)
+               if (priv->bt_ci_compliance)
                        full_concurrent = true;
                else
                        full_concurrent = false;