During ieee80211_set_active_links() we do (among the others):
1. Call drv_change_vif_links() with both old_active and new_active
2. Unassign the chanctx for the removed link(s) (if any)
3. Assign chanctx to the added link(s) (if any)
4. Call drv_change_vif_links() with the new_active links bitmap
The problem here is that during step #1 the driver doesn't know whether
we will activate multiple links simultaneously or are just doing a link
switch, so it can't check there if multiple links are supported/enabled.
(Some of the drivers might enable/disable this option dynamically)
And during step #3, in which the driver already knows that,
returning an error code (for example when multiple links are not
supported or disabled), will cause a warning, and we will still complete
the transition to the new_active links.
(It is hard to undo things in that stage, since we released channels etc.)
Therefore add a driver callback to check if the desired new_active links
will be supported by the driver or not. This callback will be called
in the beginning of ieee80211_set_active_links() so we won't do anything
before we are sure it is supported.
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/20231220133549.64c4d70b33b8.I79708619be76b8ecd4ef3975205b8f903e24a2cd@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* disable background CAC/radar detection.
* @net_fill_forward_path: Called from .ndo_fill_forward_path in order to
* resolve a path for hardware flow offloading
+ * @can_activate_links: Checks if a specific active_links bitmap is
+ * supported by the driver.
* @change_vif_links: Change the valid links on an interface, note that while
* removing the old link information is still valid (link_conf pointer),
* but may immediately disappear after the function returns. The old or
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
struct net_device_path_ctx *ctx,
struct net_device_path *path);
+ bool (*can_activate_links)(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
+ struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
+ u16 active_links);
int (*change_vif_links)(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
u16 old_links, u16 new_links,
return ret;
}
+static inline bool drv_can_activate_links(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
+ u16 active_links)
+{
+ bool ret = true;
+
+ lockdep_assert_wiphy(local->hw.wiphy);
+
+ if (!check_sdata_in_driver(sdata))
+ return false;
+
+ trace_drv_can_activate_links(local, sdata, active_links);
+ if (local->ops->can_activate_links)
+ ret = local->ops->can_activate_links(&local->hw, &sdata->vif,
+ active_links);
+ trace_drv_return_bool(local, ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
int drv_change_vif_links(struct ieee80211_local *local,
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
u16 old_links, u16 new_links,
lockdep_assert_wiphy(local->hw.wiphy);
+ if (!drv_can_activate_links(local, sdata, active_links))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
old_active = sdata->vif.active_links;
if (old_active & active_links) {
/*
)
);
+TRACE_EVENT(drv_can_activate_links,
+ TP_PROTO(struct ieee80211_local *local,
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
+ u16 active_links),
+
+ TP_ARGS(local, sdata, active_links),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ LOCAL_ENTRY
+ VIF_ENTRY
+ __field(u16, active_links)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ LOCAL_ASSIGN;
+ VIF_ASSIGN;
+ __entry->active_links = active_links;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk(
+ LOCAL_PR_FMT VIF_PR_FMT " requested active_links:0x%04x\n",
+ LOCAL_PR_ARG, VIF_PR_ARG, __entry->active_links
+ )
+);
+
TRACE_EVENT(drv_change_vif_links,
TP_PROTO(struct ieee80211_local *local,
struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,