Commit
5e07e672412b ("tcp: Use bhash2 for v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard
address.") introduced bind() regression for v4-mapped-v6 address.
When we bind() the following two addresses on the same port, the 2nd
bind() should succeed but fails now.
1. [::] w/ IPV6_ONLY
2. ::ffff:127.0.0.1
After the chagne, v4-mapped-v6 uses bhash2 instead of bhash to
detect conflict faster, but I forgot to add a necessary change.
During the 2nd bind(), inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any() returns
the tb2 bucket of [::], and inet_bhash2_conflict() finally calls
inet_bind_conflict(), which returns true, meaning conflict.
inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict
|- inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any <-- return [::] bucket
`- inet_bhash2_conflict
`- __inet_bhash2_conflict <-- checks IPV6_ONLY for AF_INET
| but not for v4-mapped-v6 address
`- inet_bind_conflict <-- does not check address
inet_bind_conflict() does not check socket addresses because
__inet_bhash2_conflict() is expected to do so.
However, it checks IPV6_V6ONLY attribute only against AF_INET
socket, and not for v4-mapped-v6 address.
As a result, v4-mapped-v6 address conflicts with v6-only wildcard
address.
To avoid that, let's add the missing test to use bhash2 for
v4-mapped-v6 address.
Fixes: 5e07e672412b ("tcp: Use bhash2 for v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address.")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326204251.51301-2-kuniyu@amazon.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kuid_t sk_uid, bool relax,
bool reuseport_cb_ok, bool reuseport_ok)
{
- if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET && ipv6_only_sock(sk2))
- return false;
+ if (ipv6_only_sock(sk2)) {
+ if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
+ return false;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+ if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr))
+ return false;
+#endif
+ }
return inet_bind_conflict(sk, sk2, sk_uid, relax,
reuseport_cb_ok, reuseport_ok);