docs/scheduler/sched-design-CFS: formatting fix

Fix the rendering of the paragraph. Before the fix, the first line is
rendered in bold (I'm not quite sure why) and is also separated from the
rest of the paragraph, which is rendered with an indent.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210120001824.385168-3-kolyshkin@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
index a96c726518771000c7805f2a9c18edbc7f0e0b14..59b2d1fb4dc4779382a7487bad7a829f9a6c6bef 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.rst
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ In CFS the virtual runtime is expressed and tracked via the per-task
 p->se.vruntime (nanosec-unit) value.  This way, it's possible to accurately
 timestamp and measure the "expected CPU time" a task should have gotten.
 
-[ small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same
-  p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task
-  would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time.  ]
+   Small detail: on "ideal" hardware, at any time all tasks would have the same
+   p->se.vruntime value --- i.e., tasks would execute simultaneously and no task
+   would ever get "out of balance" from the "ideal" share of CPU time.
 
 CFS's task picking logic is based on this p->se.vruntime value and it is thus
 very simple: it always tries to run the task with the smallest p->se.vruntime