Only pick_next_task_fair() needs the @prev and @rf argument; these are
required to implement the cpu-cgroup optimization. None of the other
pick_next_task() methods need this. Make pick_next_task_idle() more
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: ktkhai@virtuozzo.com
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: qais.yousef@arm.com
Cc: qperret@google.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108131909.545730862@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
goto restart;
/* Assumes fair_sched_class->next == idle_sched_class */
- if (unlikely(!p))
- p = idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+ if (unlikely(!p)) {
+ put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+ p = idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq, NULL, NULL);
+ }
return p;
}
{
struct task_struct *next = rq->idle;
- if (prev)
- put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(prev || rf);
set_next_task_idle(rq, next);