KVM: s390: vsie: Fix the initialization of the epoch extension (epdx) field
authorThomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Wed, 23 Nov 2022 09:08:33 +0000 (10:08 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:37:20 +0000 (11:37 +0100)
commit 0dd4cdccdab3d74bd86b868768a7dca216bcce7e upstream.

We recently experienced some weird huge time jumps in nested guests when
rebooting them in certain cases. After adding some debug code to the epoch
handling in vsie.c (thanks to David Hildenbrand for the idea!), it was
obvious that the "epdx" field (the multi-epoch extension) did not get set
to 0xff in case the "epoch" field was negative.
Seems like the code misses to copy the value from the epdx field from
the guest to the shadow control block. By doing so, the weird time
jumps are gone in our scenarios.

Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140899
Fixes: 8fa1696ea781 ("KVM: s390: Multiple Epoch Facility support")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221123090833.292938-1-thuth@redhat.com
Message-Id: <20221123090833.292938-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c

index acda4b6fc851824d22c3b7b68715c0905a8edfd1..2c0704f5eb3c62c159f6109d4d66f65873943581 100644 (file)
@@ -538,8 +538,10 @@ static int shadow_scb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
        if (test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI))
                scb_s->eca |= scb_o->eca & ECA_CEI;
        /* Epoch Extension */
-       if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 139))
+       if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 139)) {
                scb_s->ecd |= scb_o->ecd & ECD_MEF;
+               scb_s->epdx = scb_o->epdx;
+       }
 
        /* etoken */
        if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 156))