memory-device: improve "range conflicts" error message
authorDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:20:11 +0000 (11:20 +0200)
committerEduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:44:59 +0000 (06:44 -0300)
Handle id==NULL better and indicate that we are dealing with memory
devices.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20181005092024.14344-4-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
hw/mem/memory-device.c

index 7c706fadfcd179d83e696685a7eccce6d690f8cc..0624184c40bb9886f8bbb44d6406e4a92fe09553 100644 (file)
@@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ uint64_t memory_device_get_free_addr(MachineState *ms, const uint64_t *hint,
         if (ranges_overlap(md_addr, md_size, new_addr, size)) {
             if (hint) {
                 const DeviceState *d = DEVICE(md);
-                error_setg(errp, "address range conflicts with '%s'", d->id);
+                error_setg(errp, "address range conflicts with memory device"
+                           " id='%s'", d->id ? d->id : "(unnamed)");
                 goto out;
             }
             new_addr = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(md_addr + md_size, align);