vhost_virtqueue_mask takes an "absolute" virtqueue index, while the
code looks like it's passing an index that is relative to
s->dev.vq_index. In reality, s->dev.vq_index is always zero, so
this patch does not make any difference, but the code is clearer.
Signed-off-by: Lu Lina <lina.lulina@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Message-Id: <
1437978359-17960-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
* enabling/disabling irqfd.
*/
for (i = 0; i < s->dev.nvqs; i++) {
- vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, i, false);
+ vhost_virtqueue_mask(&s->dev, vdev, s->dev.vq_index + i, false);
}
return ret;